31.2 Estimating QTT with CiC
CiC relies on four distributions from a 2 × 2 Difference-in-Differences (DiD) setup:
- FY(0),00: CDF of Y(0) for control units in period 0.
- FY(0),10: CDF of Y(0) for treatment units in period 0.
- FY(0),01: CDF of Y(0) for control units in period 1.
- FY(1),11: CDF of Y(1) for treatment units in period 1.
The Quantile Treatment Effect on the Treated (QTT) at quantile θ is:
ΔQTTθ=F−1Y(1),11(θ)−F−1Y(0),11(θ)
To estimate the counterfactual CDF:
ˆFY(0),11(y)=Fy,01(F−1y,00(Fy,10(y)))
This leads to the estimation of the inverse counterfactual CDF:
ˆF−1Y(0),11(θ)=F−1y,01(Fy,00(F−1y,10(θ)))
Finally, the treatment effect estimate is:
ˆΔCICθ=F−1Y(1),11(θ)−ˆF−1Y(0),11(θ)
Alternatively, CiC can be expressed as the difference between two QTE estimates:
ΔCICθ=ΔQTEθ,1−ΔQTEθ′,0
where:
- ΔQTTθ,1 represents the change over time at quantile θ for the treated group (D=1).
- ΔQTUθ′,0 represents the change over time at quantile θ′ for the control group (D=0).
- The quantile θ′ is selected to match the value of y at quantile θ in the treated group’s period 0 distribution.
Marketing Example
Suppose a company introduces a new online marketing strategy aimed at improving customer retention rates. The goal is to analyze how this strategy affects retention at different quantiles of the customer base.
- QTT Interpretation:
- Instead of looking at the average effect of the marketing strategy, CiC allows the company to examine how retention rates change across different quantiles (e.g., low vs. high-retention customers).
- Rank Preservation Assumption:
- This approach assumes that customers’ rank in the retention distribution remains unchanged, regardless of whether they received the new strategy.
- Counterfactual Distribution:
- CiC helps estimate how retention rates would have evolved without the new strategy, by comparing trends in the control group.