31.2 Estimating QTT with CiC

CiC relies on four distributions from a 2 × 2 Difference-in-Differences (DiD) setup:

  1. FY(0),00: CDF of Y(0) for control units in period 0.
  2. FY(0),10: CDF of Y(0) for treatment units in period 0.
  3. FY(0),01: CDF of Y(0) for control units in period 1.
  4. FY(1),11: CDF of Y(1) for treatment units in period 1.

The Quantile Treatment Effect on the Treated (QTT) at quantile θ is:

ΔQTTθ=F1Y(1),11(θ)F1Y(0),11(θ)

To estimate the counterfactual CDF:

ˆFY(0),11(y)=Fy,01(F1y,00(Fy,10(y)))

This leads to the estimation of the inverse counterfactual CDF:

ˆF1Y(0),11(θ)=F1y,01(Fy,00(F1y,10(θ)))

Finally, the treatment effect estimate is:

ˆΔCICθ=F1Y(1),11(θ)ˆF1Y(0),11(θ)

Alternatively, CiC can be expressed as the difference between two QTE estimates:

ΔCICθ=ΔQTEθ,1ΔQTEθ,0

where:

  • ΔQTTθ,1 represents the change over time at quantile θ for the treated group (D=1).
  • ΔQTUθ,0 represents the change over time at quantile θ for the control group (D=0).
    • The quantile θ is selected to match the value of y at quantile θ in the treated group’s period 0 distribution.

Marketing Example

Suppose a company introduces a new online marketing strategy aimed at improving customer retention rates. The goal is to analyze how this strategy affects retention at different quantiles of the customer base.

  1. QTT Interpretation:
    • Instead of looking at the average effect of the marketing strategy, CiC allows the company to examine how retention rates change across different quantiles (e.g., low vs. high-retention customers).
  2. Rank Preservation Assumption:
    • This approach assumes that customers’ rank in the retention distribution remains unchanged, regardless of whether they received the new strategy.
  3. Counterfactual Distribution:
    • CiC helps estimate how retention rates would have evolved without the new strategy, by comparing trends in the control group.