44.1 Best Practices for HPC in Data Analysis
- Test First on a Small Scale
Before scaling your analysis to full production, begin with small-scale tests. This ensures your code runs as expected, while also providing crucial information about resource usage.
- Start small: Run the analysis on a subset of your data (e.g., 1% or 10% of the total).
- Measure resource usage:
- Execution time (wall clock time vs. CPU time).
- Memory footprint.
- CPU and disk I/O utilization.
- Record the metrics:
- Create logs or structured reports for future reference.
Example:
If you’re modeling customer churn on a dataset of 10 million records, start with 100,000 and profile its behavior.
- Estimate Resource Requirements
Use insights from small-scale tests to extrapolate the resources needed for the full analysis.
- Estimate CPU cores, memory, and execution time requirements.
- Add an overhead buffer:
- Parallel tasks introduce communication overhead and synchronization delays.
- Real-world data can have higher complexity than test data.
Guideline: If a small test consumes 1 GB of RAM and runs in 10 minutes on a single core, a 100x dataset may not scale linearly. Communication costs, disk I/O, and parallel inefficiencies could require a different scaling factor.
- Parallelize Strategically
Not all parts of your analysis benefit equally from parallelization. Identify and prioritize computational bottlenecks.
- Analyze your workflow:
- Data ingestion: Can you parallelize reading large files or querying databases?
- Transformations: Are data wrangling tasks parallelizable?
- Modeling/Training: Can independent model fits or simulations be distributed?
- Balance granularity:
- Overly fine-grained parallelization leads to high communication overhead.
- Coarser tasks are generally more efficient in parallel environments.
Tip: Use embarrassingly parallel strategies where possible—these tasks require minimal communication between workers.
- Use Adequate Scheduling and Queue Systems
In HPC clusters, job scheduling systems manage resource allocation and prioritize workloads.
Common systems include:
Slurm (Simple Linux Utility for Resource Management)
PBS (Portable Batch System)
LSF (Load Sharing Facility)
SGE (Sun Grid Engine)
Best practices:
Write job submission scripts specifying:
Wall time limits.
Memory and CPU requests.
Node allocation (if required).
Monitor jobs:
Examine logs for resource utilization (memory, time, CPU load).
Use scheduler tools (e.g.,
sacct
in Slurm) to assess historical performance.
Example Slurm job script:
#!/bin/bash
#SBATCH --job-name=churn_model
#SBATCH --output=churn_model_%j.out
#SBATCH --ntasks=1
#SBATCH --cpus-per-task=8
#SBATCH --mem=32G
#SBATCH --time=04:00:00
module load R/4.2.0
Rscript run_churn_model.R
- Incremental Scaling
Resist the temptation to scale from small tests directly to massive production jobs.
Iterate gradually:
- Start with small jobs, progress to medium-sized runs, and only then scale to full production.
Monitor I/O overhead:
Parallel jobs often stress shared storage systems.
Optimize data locality and prefetching if possible.
Tip: Use asynchronous job submission (batchtools::submitJobs()
or future::future()
) to manage job batches efficiently.
- Documentation and Reporting
Good documentation facilitates reproducibility and future optimization.
Maintain a structured report of each run, including:
Input parameters: Dataset size, preprocessing steps, model parameters.
Cluster specification: Number of nodes, CPUs per node, memory allocations.
Execution logs: Total run time, CPU utilization, memory usage.
Software environment: R version, package versions, job scheduler version.
Template for documentation:
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Dataset size | 10 million records |
Model type | Random Forest (500 trees) |
Nodes used | 4 |
CPUs per node | 8 |
Memory per node | 32 GB |
Wall time | 2 hours |
Software environment | R 4.2.0, ranger 0.14.1 |
Scheduler | Slurm 20.11.8 |