D.31 Answers: Correlation
Answers to exercises in Sect. 34.8.
Answer to Exercise 34.1:
Many correct answers.
Answer to Exercise 34.2:
1. R2=0.8812=77.6%.
About 77.6% of the variation in punting distance
can be explained by the variation in right-leg strength.
2. H0: ρ=0 and H1: ρ≠0.
t=6.16; P-value very small.
Very strong evidence of a correlation in the population.
Answer to Exercise 34.3:
The plot looks linear; n=25;
variation doesn’t seem constant.
Answer to Exercise 34.4:
1. Very close to −1.
2. r=−√0.9929=−0.9964. (r must be negative!)
3. Very small. This is a very large value for r on a reasonable sized sample.
4. Yes.
Answer to Exercise 35.5:
1. b0: When someone spends no time on sunscreen application,
an average of 0.27g has been applied; nonsense.
b1: Each extra minute spent on application
adds an average of 2.21g of sunscreen: sensible.
2. The value of β0 could be zero… which would make sense.
3. ˆy=0.27+(2.21×8)=17.95; an average of about 18g.
4. About 64% of the variation in sunscreen amount applied
can be explained by the variation in the time spent on application.
5. r=√0.64=0.8,
and need a positive value of r.
A strong and positive correlation between the variables.