D.31 Answers: Correlation

Answers to exercises in Sect. 34.8.

Answer to Exercise 34.1: Many correct answers.
Answer to Exercise 34.2: 1. R2=0.8812=77.6%. About 77.6% of the variation in punting distance can be explained by the variation in right-leg strength. 2. H0: ρ=0 and H1: ρ0. t=6.16; P-value very small. Very strong evidence of a correlation in the population.
Answer to Exercise 34.3: The plot looks linear; n=25; variation doesn’t seem constant.
Answer to Exercise 34.4: 1. Very close to 1. 2. r=0.9929=0.9964. (r must be negative!) 3. Very small. This is a very large value for r on a reasonable sized sample. 4. Yes.
Answer to Exercise 35.5: 1. b0: When someone spends no time on sunscreen application, an average of 0.27g has been applied; nonsense. b1: Each extra minute spent on application adds an average of 2.21g of sunscreen: sensible. 2. The value of β0 could be zero… which would make sense. 3. ˆy=0.27+(2.21×8)=17.95; an average of about 18g. 4. About 64% of the variation in sunscreen amount applied can be explained by the variation in the time spent on application. 5. r=0.64=0.8, and need a positive value of r. A strong and positive correlation between the variables.