29.2 Testing

29.2.1 Parametric Test

(S. J. Brown and Warner 1985) provide evidence that even in the presence of non-normality, the parametric tests still perform well. Since the proportion of positive and negative abnormal returns tends to be equal in the sample (of at least 5 securities). The excess returns will coverage to normality as the sample size increases. Hence, parametric test is advocated than non-parametric one.

Low power to detect significance (Kothari and Warner 1997)

  • Power = f(sample, size, the actual size of abnormal returns, the variance of abnormal returns across firms)

29.2.1.1 T-test

Applying CLT

\[ \begin{aligned} t_{CAR} &= \frac{\bar{CAR_{it}}}{\sigma (CAR_{it})/\sqrt{n}} \\ t_{BHAR} &= \frac{\bar{BHAR_{it}}}{\sigma (BHAR_{it})/\sqrt{n}} \end{aligned} \]

Assume

  • Abnormal returns are normally distributed

  • Var(abnormal returns) are equal across firms

  • No cross-correlation in abnormal returns.

Hence, it will be misspecified if you suspected

  • Heteroskedasticity

  • Cross-sectional dependence

  • Technically, abnormal returns could follow non-normal distribution (but because of the design of abnormal returns calculation, it typically forces the distribution to be normal)

To address these concerns, Patell Standardized Residual (PSR) can sometimes help.

29.2.1.2 Patell Standardized Residual (PSR)

(Patell 1976)

  • Since market model uses observations outside the event window, abnormal returns contain prediction errors on top of the true residuals , and should be standardized:

\[ AR_{it} = \frac{\hat{u}_{it}}{s_i \sqrt{C_{it}}} \]

where

  • \(\hat{u}_{it}\) = estimated residual

  • \(s_i\) = standard deviation estimate of residuals (from the estimation period)

  • \(C_{it}\) = a correction to account for the prediction’s increased variation outside of the estimation period (Strong 1992)

\[ C_{it} = 1 + \frac{1}{T} + \frac{(R_{mt} - \bar{R}_m)^2}{\sum_t (R_{mt} - \bar{R}_m)^2} \]

where

  • \(T\) = number of observations (from estimation period)

  • \(R_{mt}\) = average rate of return of all stocks trading the the stock market at time \(t\)

  • \(\bar{R}_m = \frac{1}{T} \sum_{t=1}^T R_{mt}\)

29.2.2 Non-parametric Test

  • No assumptions about return distribution

  • Sign Test (assumes symmetry in returns)

    • binom.test()
  • Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test (allows for non-symmetry in returns)

    • Use wilcox.test(sample)
  • Gen Sign Test

  • Corrado Rank Test

References

———. 1985. “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.” Journal of Financial Economics 14 (1): 3–31.
Kothari, SP, and Jerold B Warner. 1997. “Measuring Long-Horizon Security Price Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics 43 (3): 301–39.
Patell, James M. 1976. “Corporate Forecasts of Earnings Per Share and Stock Price Behavior: Empirical Test.” Journal of Accounting Research, 246–76.
Strong, Norman. 1992. “Modelling Abnormal Returns: A Review Article.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 19 (4): 533–53.