34.11 Digital marketing and WOM

Berger and Milkman (2012)

  • Positive emotional valence content is more likely to be shared

  • Activation = physiological arousal induces action.

  1. Examine 7000 articles from thew New York Times

    1. Examine emotionality, prominent features, interest evoked can affect likelihood to make the most email list. (controlling for practically content usefulness, interestingness, surprise, release timing and author fame (using hits for first author’s full name from the number of Google hits), writing complexity, author gender, article length and day dummies).

    2. Robustness: control for article’s general topic.

  2. Lab experiments

    1. Amusement case (fictitious): high arousal

    2. Anger case (real): high arousal

    3. Sadness (real vs. fictitious): low arousal

All hypotheses are confirmed

Potential confounders: structural virality

How likely they would share a story? (no social risk involved - risk to other weak ties, hence the effect might be inflated, the same thing with the New York Times study )

All experiments have low participant numbers

Tellis et al. (2019)

Two field studies

  • Information-focused content is less likely to be shared (exception risky contexts)

  • Positive emotions (e.g., amusement, excitement, inspiration, warmth) are more likely to be shared

  • Drama elements (e.g., surprise, plot, characters, babies, animals, celebrities) increase arousal, which in turn increases sharing.

  • Prominent placement of brand name (brand prominence)

  • Emotional ads are shared more on general platforms (Facebook, Twitter) as compared to professional one (e.g., LinkedIn), while informational ads are more likely to be shared on professional ones.

  • Optimal length is 1.2 to 1.7 min ads.

Third study: identifies predictors of sharing

Lovett, Peres, and Shachar (2013)

Melumad and Pham (2020)

Vosoughi, Roy, and Aral (2018)

Moore (2012)

Naylor, Lamberton, and West (2012)

P. Nguyen et al. (2020)

References

Berger, Jonah, and Katherine L. Milkman. 2012. “What Makes Online Content Viral?” Journal of Marketing Research 49 (2): 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353.
Feldman Barrett, Lisa, and James A. Russell. 1998. “Independence and Bipolarity in the Structure of Current Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (4): 967–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.967.
Heilman, Kenneth. 1997. “The Neurobiology of Emotional Experience.” The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 9 (3): 439–48. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.9.3.439.
Lovett, Mitchell J., Renana Peres, and Ron Shachar. 2013. “On Brands and Word of Mouth.” Journal of Marketing Research 50 (4): 427–44. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0458.
Melumad, Shiri, and Michel Tuan Pham. 2020. “The Smartphone as a Pacifying Technology.” Edited by Darren W Dahl, Amna Kirmani, and Peter R Darke. Journal of Consumer Research 47 (2): 237–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa005.
Moore, Sarah G. 2012. “Some Things Are Better Left Unsaid: How Word of Mouth Influences the Storyteller.” Journal of Consumer Research 38 (6): 1140–54. https://doi.org/10.1086/661891.
Naylor, Rebecca Walker, Cait Poynor Lamberton, and Patricia M. West. 2012. “Beyond the Like Button: The Impact of Mere Virtual Presence on Brand Evaluations and Purchase Intentions in Social Media Settings.” Journal of Marketing 76 (6): 105–20. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0105.
Nguyen, Peter, Xin (Shane) Wang, Xi Li, and June Cotte. 2020. “Reviewing Experts Restraint from Extremes and Its Impact on Service Providers.” Edited by J Jeffrey Inman and Andrew T Stephen. Journal of Consumer Research 47 (5): 654–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa037.
Tellis, Gerard J., Deborah J. MacInnis, Seshadri Tirunillai, and Yanwei Zhang. 2019. “What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence.” Journal of Marketing 83 (4): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919841034.
Vosoughi, Soroush, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. “The Spread of True and False News Online.” Science 359 (6380): 1146–51. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.