8.4 Brand Authenticity

This construct is to be determined, we still have not consensus whether this is a reflective or formative construct. The first paper (Morhart et al. 2015) is a reflective model, but could not find a latent construct of brand authenticity and they have some troubles with the first order dimensions. On the other hand, (Nunes, Ordanini, and Giambastiani 2021) recently introduced the formative measurement scale of authenticity. But their arguments on this paper is still questionable.

Morhart et al. (2015)

  • Perceived brand authenticity measurement scale

  • “PBA arises from the interplay of objective facts (indexical authenticity), subjective mental associations (iconic authenticity), and existential motives connected to a brand (existential authenticity).” (p. 202)

  • Definition: PBA is “the extent to which consumers perceive a brand to be faithful and true toward itself and its consumers, and to support consumers being true to themselves.” (p. 202)

  • Dependent variables: emotional brand attachment, positive WOM

  • PBA is the interplay of

    • Objective facts (indexical authenticity) - objectivist perceptive

    • Subjective mental association (iconic authenticity) - constructivist perspective

    • Existential motives connected to a brand (existential authenticity) - existentialist perspective

  • Four reflective measures:

    • Continuity

    • Integrity

    • Credibility

    • Symbolism

Nunes, Ordanini, and Giambastiani (2021)

  • Authenticity has 6 formative constructs: accuracy, connectedness, integrity, legitimacy, originality, and proficiency

  • Authenticity is defined as “a holistic consumer assessment determined by six component judgments (accuracy, connectedness, integrity, legitimacy originality, and proficiency) whereby the role of each component can change according to the consumption context.” (p. 2)

  • Definitions of the six components (p. 3)

  • Authenticity is conceptually different from consumer attitude

  • Using grounded theory to come up with potential dimension, and verify the measurement model of authenticity based on PLS

  • Dependent variables: attitudes, behavioral intentions.

References

Morhart, Felicitas, Lucia Malär, Amélie Guèvremont, Florent Girardin, and Bianca Grohmann. 2015. “Brand Authenticity: An Integrative Framework and Measurement Scale.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 25 (2): 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006.
Nunes, Joseph C., Andrea Ordanini, and Gaia Giambastiani. 2021. “The Concept of Authenticity: What It Means to Consumers.” Journal of Marketing 85 (4): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921997081.