22.4 Statistical validity conditions: One mean

As with any inference procedure, the underlying mathematics requires certain conditions to be met so that the results are statistically valid. The CI for one mean, will be statistical valid if one of these is true:

  1. The sample size is at least 25, or
  2. The sample size is smaller than 25 and the population data has an approximate normal distribution.

The sample size of 25 is a rough figure here, and some books give other values (such as 30). This condition ensures that the distribution of the sample means has an approximate normal distribution so that the 68–95–99.7 rule can be used.

Provided the sample size is larger than about 25, this will be approximately true even if the distribution of the individuals in the population does not have a normal distribution. That is, when \(n > 25\) the sample means generally have an approximate normal distribution, even if the data themselves don’t have a normal distribution.

In addition to the statistical validity condition, the CI will be

When \(n > 25\) approximately, we do not require that the data has a normal distribution. We require that the sample means have a normal distribution, which is approximately true if the statistical validity condition is true.

This is one reason why means are used to describe samples: under certain conditions, sample means have an approximate normal distribution (so the 68–95–99.7 rule applies). In contrast, the distribution of sample medians is far more complicated to describe.

To determine if assuming the population has an approximate normal distribution in the statistical validity condition, the histogram of the sample can be constructed. However, we can’t really be sure about the distribution of the population from the distribution of the sample. All we can reasonably do is to identify (from the sample) populations that likely to be very non-normal (when the CI would be not valid).

Example 22.3 (Assumptions) A study (Silverman et al. 1999; Zou et al. 2003) to examine exposure to radiation for CT scans in the abdomen assessed \(n = 17\) patients. A histogram of the total radiation dose received is shown in Fig. 22.2; the sample mean dose is 26.86 rads.

A CI for the mean radiation dose received could be formed. However, as the sample size is ‘small’ (less than 25), the population must have a normal distribution for the CI to be statistically valid. Even though the histogram is from sample data, it seems improbable that the data in the sample would have come from a population with a normal distribution: the histogram of the sample data doesn’t look normally distributed at all.

Computing a CI for the mean of these data will probably be statistically invalid. Other methods (beyond the scope of this course) are possible for computing a confidence interval for the mean.
The radiation doses from CT scans for 17 people

FIGURE 22.2: The radiation doses from CT scans for 17 people

Example 22.4 (School bags) In Example 22.1, an approximate 95% CI was formed for the mean weight of school bags for Iranian children.

Since the sample size was \(n = 586\), the CI is statistically valid.

We do not have to assume that the distribution of school bag weights has a normal distribution in the population, as the sample size is (much) larger than 25.

Example 22.5 (Black bears) In Example 22.2, the approximate 95% CI was formed from a sample of size \(n = 185\) male bears.

This CI is statistically valid, since the sample size is much larger than 25.

We do not have to assume that the distribution of the weights of male black bears has a normal distribution in the population, as the sample size is (much) larger than 25.

References

Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF. CT fluoroscopy-guided adbominal interventions: Techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology. 1999;212:673–81.
Zou KH, Tuncali K, Silverman SG. Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology. 2003;227:617–28.