Chapter 4 Moderating effects of issue importance on losers

(#tab:1045_importance_treatment_fairness)Moderating effects of issue importance on experimental treatment, Study 1 – Swedish vignette

Factor	Issue importance	AME	SE	z-statistic	p value	Lower	Upper
Generic good loser prime	1	1.07	0.42	2.52	0.01	0.24	1.90
Generic good loser prime	2	1.01	0.32	3.10	0.00	0.37	1.64
Generic good loser prime	3	0.95	0.25	3.85	0.00	0.46	1.43
Generic good loser prime	4	0.89	0.21	4.17	0.00	0.47	1.30
Generic good loser prime	5	0.82	0.24	3.39	0.00	0.35	1.30
Generic good loser prime	6	0.76	0.32	2.38	0.02	0.13	1.39
Generic good loser prime	7	0.70	0.42	1.67	0.09	-0.12	1.52
Lamenting politician	1	0.38	0.43	0.88	0.38	-0.47	1.23
Lamenting politician	2	0.35	0.33	1.05	0.30	-0.30	0.99
Lamenting politician	3	0.31	0.25	1.24	0.21	-0.18	0.80
Lamenting politician	4	0.28	0.21	1.29	0.20	-0.14	0.69
Lamenting politician	5	0.24	0.25	0.98	0.33	-0.24	0.72
Lamenting politician	6	0.20	0.32	0.63	0.53	-0.43	0.84
Lamenting politician	7	0.17	0.42	0.40	0.69	-0.66	1.00
Note:
Sample: Respondents with unfavorable outcome.

(#tab:1045_exp1_mods)Moderating effects of issue importance, Study 1 – Swedish vignette

Treatment value	Estimate	Std. Error	t-statistic	p value
Intercept	3.42	0.25	13.73	0.00
Lamenting politician	0.03	0.34	0.10	0.92
Generic good loser prime	0.81	0.34	2.41	0.02
Issue not important to respondent	0.07	0.32	0.21	0.83
Lamenting politician w/ issue not important to respondent	0.40	0.44	0.91	0.37
Generic good loser prime w/ issue not important to respondent	0.12	0.43	0.29	0.78
Note:
Sample: Respondents with unfavorable outcome.