S.I. 9 Pre-treatment, vignette, post-treatment

The statistics are displayed for the respondents of interest in this study, which is the respondents who end up with observing an unfavorable decision outcome in the experiment.

9.1 Pre-treatment measures

9.1.1 Ban on begging - opinion

(#tab:3031_pre1)What is your opinion on a ban on begging in your municipality?
Value N Percent
In favor 836 60
Oppose 553 40
NA 5 0

9.1.2 Ban on begging - importance

(#tab:3031_pre2)How important is the issue of begging ban to you?
Value N Percent
Not important at all 79 6
Slightly important 251 18
Somewhat important 447 32
Important 517 37
Very important 100 7

The mean score for the pre treatment measure “How important is the issue of begging ban to you?” is 3.55, and the standard deviation is 5.94.

9.1.3 Toll on diesel cars - opinion

(#tab:3031_pre3)What is your opinion on an increase in the tolls for diesel cars in your municipality?
Value N Percent
In favor 359 26
Oppose 1026 74
NA 9 1

9.1.4 Toll on diesel cars - importance

(#tab:3031_pre4)How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?
Value N Percent
Not important at all 230 16
Slightly important 377 27
Somewhat important 382 27
Important 302 22
Very important 99 7
NA 4 0

The mean score for the pre treatment measure “How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?” is 3.24, and the standard deviation is 6.96.

9.2 Experimental vignette

Table 9.1: Vignette treatment dimensions and values
Preference Treatment Text
Issue Ban on begging in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “Yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “No” side). Some
Diesel car road toll in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the side), while others are strongly against an increase (the “No” side). Some parties propose such an
Outcome Yes The Yes side won the vote
No The No side won the vote
Winning margin Not shown .
Small margin with a slight majority.
Large margin with a large majority.
Winner’s gloating Not shown
Yes Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed.
Messenger and prime Not shown
Politician, no prime The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong.
Politician, specific good loser prime The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views.
Politician, generic good loser prime The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.
Newspaper, no prime The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong.
Newspaper, specific good loser prime The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views.
Newspaper, generic good loser prime The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.
Note:
Experimental vignette (treatments in {curly brackets}): Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow. Imagine that your municipality must decide on {Issue} The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate. In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. {Outcome} {[Winning margin} {Winner gloating} {Messenger and prime}

9.3 Post treatment measures

Please note that the the respondents were randomly assigned to either a worded answer scale, or a numbered answer scale. This accounts for the high share of NA’s in the post treatment distribution tables.

9.3.1 Evaluation

(#tab:3031_post1)What do you think about the way the decision was made?
Value N Percent
Not fair at all 104 7
Slightly fair 417 30
Somewhat fair 110 8
Fair 61 4
Very fair 33 2
NA 669 48
(#tab:3031_post1)What do you think about the way the decision was made?
Value N Percent
1 Not fair 252 18
2 190 14
3 135 10
4 42 3
5 Most fair 36 3
NA 739 53

The mean score for the pre treatment measure “What do you think about the way the decision was made?” is 48.71, and the standard deviation is 47.9 for the worded answer scale. For the numbered answer scale, the mean score is 52.44, and the standard deviation is 47.97

9.3.2 Reasonable decision

(#tab:3031_post2)How reasonable do you think the decision was?
Value N Percent
Not reasonable at all 39 3
Slightly reasonable 293 21
Somewhat reasonable 147 11
Reasonable 172 12
Very reasonable 74 5
NA 669 48
(#tab:3031_post2)How reasonable do you think the decision was?
Value N Percent
1 Not reasonable 127 9
2 142 10
3 203 15
4 101 7
5 Most reasonable 74 5
NA 747 54

The mean score for the pre treatment measure “How reasonable do you think the decision was?” is 49.05, and the standard deviation is 47.73 for the worded answer scale. For the numbered answer scale, the mean score is 52.95, and the standard deviation is 47.77

9.3.3 Acceptance

(#tab:3031_post3)When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are you to accept the decision?
Value N Percent
Not willing at all 81 6
Slightly willing 345 25
Somewhat willing 159 11
Willing 106 8
Very willing 36 3
NA 667 48
(#tab:3031_post3)When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are you to accept the decision?
Value N Percent
1 Not willing 185 13
2 204 15
3 150 11
4 59 4
5 Most willing 54 4
NA 742 53

The mean score for the pre treatment measure “When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are you to accept the decision?” is 48.71, and the standard deviation is 47.86 for the worded answer scale. For the numbered answer scale, the mean score is 52.61, and the standard deviation is 47.93