5.3 Resilience Communication Theories

(Buzzanell 2010)

  • Human resilience is “the ability to”bounce back" or reintegrate after difficult life experiences"

  • Resilience is not possessed by individual but by discourse, interaction, and processes:

    • crafting normalcy

    • affirming identity anchors:

      • identity anchor is “a relatively enduring cluster of identity discourses upon which individuals and their familial, collegial, and/or community members rely when explaining who they are for themselves and in relation to each other.”
    • maintaining and using communication networks

      • Social capital is important in time of need
    • putting alternative logics to work

    • downplaying negative feelings while foregrounding positive emotions

  • (Richardson 2002) defines resilience as “the process of reintegrating from disruptions in life”

    • requires “trigger event”


(AFIFI, MERRILL, and DAVIS 2016)

  • Theory of resilience and relational load (TRRL) in the context of social

    • based on theory of

      • emotional capital

      • adaptive calibration model, allostatic load, investment model, family systems theory, affectionate exchange theory, broaden and build theory

    • Assumptions

      • people want to feel validated and secure, based on sociometer hypothesis, intergroup theories, social identity theory, evolutionary theories (e.g., exchange theory).

      • stress is natural and necessary (either good or bad).

        • good stress = positive perception of stressors

        • bad stress = distress = negative perception of stressors

      • body and mind work together to cope with stress

      • body has a natural diurnal rhythm

      • relationship have homeostasis that is “continually being calibrated in response to stress and the communication of stress.”

    • Propositions:

      • “Validating communicative maintenance behaviors and actions over time build positive emotional reserves. Emotional reserves reflect the accumulation of investments (i.e., maintenance) and discrepancies in investments”

      • Communal orientation & discrepancies influence communication maintenance behaviors/discrepancies, and vice versa

      • Communal orientation, emotional reserves, discrepancies in the communal orientation influence how one perceives stressors, which later influence their investment in the relationship

      • communal orientation and emotional reserves, discrepancies int eh communal orientation influence threat and security-based appraisals and communication pattern

        • Similar constructs to communal orientation are cognitive interdependence, couple identity, communal coping

        • self-control could be depleted

      • continued depletion of resources and increased stress increase relational load

      • short-term depletion and relation load have short-term and long-term health consequences respectively.

      • “Security-based appraisals and communication patterns facilitate resilience, the potential to thrive, and short-term and long-term health”

      • Communicative maintenance strategies can be learned

  • Resilience is “the ability to adapt positively when confronted with adversity or stress” (Luthar 2003)

  • positive relationship maintenance can serve as resilience in close relationships, via

    • nonverbal behaviors

    • perceptions

Picture from Personal Relationships, Volume: 23, Issue: 4, Pages: 663-683, First published: 26 October 2016, DOI: (10.1111/pere.12159)


(Buzzanell and Houston 2018)

Resilience include:

  • Individual/relational resilience: social relationship can increase adaptive ability to adversity. To increase one’s resilience

    • giving and receiving affection

    • exchanging person-centered messages

    • being present

  • family resilience

    • parent-child (dyadic) can foster resilience
  • organizational resilience

    • 5 tensional processes
  • community resilience

    • bouncing forward = interactional process that helps individuals to adapt successfully to changing circumstances
  • national resilience

    • resilience is defined by Hamilton Bean as a “central trope,” “shared social phenomenon” that solidify “shared feelings of resoluteness.”


(Kam, Torres, and Fazio 2018)

  • How undocumented youth cope with stress at the family level

  • Resilience is “the process by which individuals exposed to adversity exhibit positive adaptation in spite of this adversity.” It is a general pattern or process than a trait or quality.

  • To cope with stress, youths use strategies:

    • psychological suppression

    • distraction/diversion

    • reframing

    • normalizing

  • The individual as an asset

  • The family as a resource

  • Stress come from

    • unable to go places, unable to attend college, employment, help family financially, affordable health care

    • fear of detainment/deportation


(First et al. 2020)

  • Covid-19 exposure directly influence stress, and indirectly influence stress and depress through media use and interpersonal communication.

References

AFIFI, TAMARA D., ANNE F. MERRILL, and SHARDE DAVIS. 2016. “The Theory of Resilience and Relational Load.” Personal Relationships 23 (4): 663–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12159.
Buzzanell, Patrice M. 2010. “Resilience: Talking, Resisting, and Imagining New Normalcies into Being.” Journal of Communication 60 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01469.x.
Buzzanell, Patrice M., and J. Brian Houston. 2018. “Communication and Resilience: Multilevel Applications and Insights a Journal of Applied Communication Research Forum.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 46 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1412086.
First, Jennifer M., Haejung Shin, Yerina S. Ranjit, and J. Brian Houston. 2020. COVID-19 Stress and Depression: Examining Social Media, Traditional Media, and Interpersonal Communication.” Journal of Loss and Trauma 26 (2): 101–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1835386.
Kam, Jennifer A., Debora Pérez Torres, and Keli Steuber Fazio. 2018. “Identifying Individual- and Family-Level Coping Strategies as Sources of Resilience and Thriving for Undocumented Youth of Mexican Origin.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 46 (5): 641–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1528373.
Luthar, Suniya S., ed. 2003. Resilience and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615788.
Richardson, Glenn E. 2002. “The Metatheory of Resilience and Resiliency.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 58 (3): 307–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10020.