References
Brown, Scott D, and Andrew Heathcote. 2008. “The Simplest Complete Model of Choice Response Time: Linear Ballistic Accumulation.” Cognitive Psychology 57 (3): 153–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002.
Donkin, C., S. D. Brown, A. J. Heathcote, and E.–J. Wagenmakers. 2011. “Diffusion Versus Linear Ballistic Accumulation: Different Models for Response Time, Same Conclusions about Psychological Mechanisms?” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 55: 140–51.
Gunawan, D., G. E. Hawkins, M-N Tran, R Kohn, and S. D. Brown. 2020. “New Estimation Approaches for the Hierarchical Linear Ballistic Accumulator Model.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 96: 102368.
Heathcote, A., and J. Love. 2012. “Linear Deterministic Accumulator Models of Simple Choice.” Frontiers in Psychology 3: n/a. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00292.
Heitz, R. P. 2014. “The Speed–Accuracy Tradeoff: History, Physiology, Methodology, Behavior.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: n/a. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00150.
Huang, A., and M. P. Wand. 2013. “Simple Marginally Noninformative Prior Distributions for Covariance Matrices.” Bayesian Analysis 8 (2): 439–52.
Rae, Babette, Andrew Heathcote, Chris Donkin, Lee Averell, and Scott D Brown. 2014. “The Hare and the Tortoise: Emphasizing Speed Can Change the Evidence Used to Make Decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40 (5): 1226.
Rouder, Jeffrey N, Jordan M Province, Richard D Morey, Pablo Gomez, and Andrew Heathcote. 2015. “The Lognormal Race: A Cognitive-Process Model of Choice and Latency with Desirable Psychometric Properties.” Psychometrika 80 (2): 491–513.
Tillman, Gabriel, Van Zandt Trish, and Gordon D Logan. 2020. “Sequential Sampling Models Without Random Between-Trial Variability: The Racing Diffusion Model of Speeded Decision Making.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Wall, Laura, David Gunawan, Scott D Brown, Minh-Ngoc Tran, Robert Kohn, and Guy E Hawkins. 2021. “Identifying Relationships Between Cognitive Processes Across Tasks, Contexts, and Time.” Behavior Research Methods 53 (1): 78–95.