• Eagle I.O Engagement Tech Report
  • Home
  • 1 Introduction
    • 1.1 Engagement as a Psychological Construct
  • 2 Instrument creation
    • 2.1 Intended Structure
    • 2.2 Item generation
    • 2.3 Content Validation
  • 3 Procedure
    • 3.1 Pilot
      • 3.1.1 Sampling strategy (pilot)
    • 3.2 Demographic Information
  • 4 Analyses
    • 4.1 Pilot analyses
      • 4.1.1 Classical test theory
      • 4.1.2 Confirmatory factor analyses
    • 4.2 Final Scale Definitions
      • 4.2.1 Corrected item-total informed scale definitions
      • 4.2.2 Modification index-informed scale definitions
    • 4.3 Final proposed structure
      • 4.3.1 Omega
    • 4.4 Multigroup analyses
    • 4.5 Summary
  • 5 Construct and Criterion-related Validation
  • 6 Future plans
    • 6.1 Things to do
    • 6.2 Research projects
  • 7 Author bios
  • 8 References
  • Appendices
  • A Timeline of events
    • A.1 Spring 2019
    • A.2 Spring 2020
      • A.2.1 February 4, 2020
      • A.2.2 February 24, 2020
      • A.2.3 Structural considerations
    • A.3 Summer 2020
  • B Pilot conditions
  • C Pilot demographics
    • C.1 Response date
    • C.2 Response latencies
    • C.3 Geographic constituency
  • D Correlations
    • D.1 Inter-Item correlations
    • D.2 Scale-level correlations
      • D.2.1 Substantive scales
      • D.2.2 Attitudinal scales
  • E Corrected item-total correlations
    • E.1 “Marginal” level
      • E.1.1 Attitudinal
      • E.1.2 Construct Substantive
    • E.2 “Cell” level
  • F Qualitative item characteristics
    • F.1 Frequency distributions by dimension
    • F.2 Tables of qualitative indices
  • G CFA Modification Indices
  • Published with bookdown

Engagement Survey Technical Report

5 Construct and Criterion-related Validation

Probably move this to its own chapter

Use Gallup for construct validation (Harter et al., 2013; Thackray, 2005). Also the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES; Schaufeli et al., 2002; Wilmar B. Schaufeli & Bakker, 2010)