9 Manuscript figures

9.1 Country Level Hazard

9.2 Fleet Analysis

Firstly, the top and bottom 10

Table 8: Top and bottom 10 fleets by risk
Fleet segement	Value of landings	Hazard rank	Exposure rank	Vulnerability rank	Risk rank
DNK A27 TM40XX	363359393	20	190	8	1
ITA A37 PGP0006	5721462	209	8	16	2
PRT A27 DFN1012	356623	161	14	56	3
PRT A27 DTS0010	381875	177	54	10	4
ESP A37 DFN0612	630329	211	12	30	5
ESP A37 DRB1218	167984	38	140	77	6
PRT A27 PGP0010	9661098	114	66	83	7
ESP A27 PS2440	34961230	51	119	93	8
PRT A27 TBB0010	263508	131	56	90	9
ITA A37 PMP1218 °	449076	66	158	54	10

Table 8: Top and bottom 10 fleets by risk
Fleet segement	Value of landings	Hazard rank	Exposure rank	Vulnerability rank	Risk rank
BGR A37 HOK0006	987	198	310	343	349
DNK A27 DTS0010	461395	311	244	292	350
LTU A27 DFN1012 °	254828	308	338	212	351
FRA A27 FPO1824 °	3387456	348	304	205	352
PRT A27 DRB1012	1071358	341	226	289	353
BGR A37 FPO0006	1451	207	326	343	354
ESP A27 DRB1012	293883	355	350	178	355
BEL A27 PMP1824 °	495885	351	313	252	356
GBR A27 HOK1012 °	355039	349	303	285	357
ESP A27 DRB1218	2285575	356	358	267	358
Caption: Fleet segme	nts with the top and	bottom 10 cli	mate risk scores	.

In total, we have been able to assess risk for 358 fleet segments.

Caption: Climate risk as a function of the size range of vessels in each fleet segment. Note that the STECF definitions of length range vary between country and therefore have a degree of overlap. The distribution of risk is represented on a linear scale from highest to lowest: the absolute values are not shown, as they have little direct meaning. Risk is shown as a boxplot, where the horizontal line is the median, the box corresponds to the interquartile range (IQR), and the whiskers cover all points less than 1.5 times the IQR from the box. Outliers are plotted as points. The number of fleet segments in each class is shown at the top: in total there are 358 fleet segments in the analysis.

DFN: Drift and/or fixed netters, DRB: Dredgers, DTS: Demersal trawlers and/or demersal seiners, FPO: Vessels using pots and/or traps, HOK: Vessels using hooks, MGO: Vessel using other active gears, MGP: Vessels using polyvalent active gears only, PG: Passive Gears, PGO: Vessels using other passive gears, PGP: Vessels using polyvalent passive gears only, PMP: Vessels using active and passive gears, PS: Purse seiners, TBB: Beam trawlers, TM: Pelagic trawlers

QUESTION: I’m not quite sure how whether to retain the other fishing region fleets, or just keep it to the FAO27 and FAO37 areas - we don’t have very much biological information outside these regions.

QUESTION: I can also plot this as a map, based on the median value…

CAPTION:

9.3 Regional Analysis

9.3.1 Components

Caption: Map of the individual elements of the regional risk analysis. a) Hazard b) Exposure and c) Vulnerability are plotted for each of the regions in the analysis. Each metric is rescaled so that the range between panels is identical. Colour scale is linear in the value of the corresponding score,but is presented without values as they have little direct meaning. National-level borders are shown for reference.

TODO:

Reproject to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-area projections
Check Iceland problems
Map inserts for Malta and other small countries
Could be merged with the overall figure for regional risk, but I think it makes more sense to have it separate.

9.3.2 Regional Risk

Caption: Map of the regional climate risk. Colour scale is linear in the value of the corresponding score, but is presented without values, as they have little direct meaning. National-level borders are shown for reference.

TODO: * Reproject to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-area projections

9.4 Combined analysis

Caption: Note that Iceland and Norway are not shown, as there is no fleet data available for these countries. Note that we use straight medians, rather than weighted medians, as there is no clear value-of-fisheries data available for the regions. Or maybe there is in EUMOFA. Check this.