3  cB211.072.64

This are data generated in the PRACE project plnugamma. The smearing parameters where: 30 iteration with parameter 4

M_{PS} = 0.05665(12) \chi^2/dof= 0.50193

M_{K}(s0) = 0.18038(22) \chi^2/dof= 0.76891

M_{K}(s1) = 0.20042(26) \chi^2/dof= 0.68845

M_{K}(s2) = 0.21868(31) \chi^2/dof= 0.62525

M_{Ds}^{GEVP}(c0,s0) = 0.71698(32) \chi^2/dof= 0.66294

M_{Ds}^{GEVP}(c0,s1) = 0.72517(25) \chi^2/dof= 0.88695

M_{Ds}^{GEVP}(c0,s2) = 0.73328(20) \chi^2/dof= 1.0573

M_{Ds}^{GEVP}(c1,s0) = 0.75937(36) \chi^2/dof= 0.70838

M_{Ds}^{GEVP}(c1,s1) = 0.76741(28) \chi^2/dof= 0.93412

M_{Ds}^{GEVP}(c1,s2) = 0.77537(23) \chi^2/dof= 1.1093

M_{Ds}^{GEVP}(c2,s0) = 0.80023(40) \chi^2/dof= 0.76082

M_{Ds}^{GEVP}(c2,s1) = 0.80813(31) \chi^2/dof= 0.98371

M_{Ds}^{GEVP}(c2,s2) = 0.81597(26) \chi^2/dof= 1.1588

<r >

3.1 Fit the Kaon

\chi^2/dof= 7.42958

P	value
P[0]	0.10359(24)
P[1]	5.202(18)

a\mu_s	aM_K	err
0.01692	0.191614	0.0002422

3.2 Fit the D_s

\chi^2/dof= 2.04413

P	value
P[0]	0.31274(49)
P[1]	1.8984(19)
P[2]	2.170(20)

a\mu_c	aM_{D_s}	err
0.2368	0.798997	0.0003404

3.3 Plateau D_s

here we compare the effective mass obtained with smeared or local operator with the one obtained by the GEVP

<r >

Here we compare f_{D_s} computed from the local-local correlator,
projecting the operator according to the leading GEVP eigenvector and using the smeared-smeared and local-smeared correlators

<r >