These questions will form part of this topic's computer lab.
Exercise 3.1 A study examined the relationship between diet quality and depression in Australian adolescents (Jacka et al. 2010). The researchers used a sample of 7114 adolescents aged 10--14 years old in their study, and also measured information about:
After identifying the response and explanatory variables, which of these listed variable reasonably could be considered extraneous variables, confounding variables and lurking variables?
...age, gender, socioeconomic status, parental education, parental work status, family conflict, poor family management, dieting behaviours, body mass index, physical activity, and smoking...
Exercise 3.2 A newspaper article (Anonymous 2012) reported on a study that found
Women who drank green tea at least three times a week were 14 per cent less likely to develop a cancer of the digestive system.
However, the final paragraph of the article notes that:
Identify the explanatory and response variables, and explain that final sentence using terms introduced in this chapter.
Nobody can say whether green tea itself is the reason, since green tea lovers are often more health-conscious in general.
Exercise 3.3 A study recorded the lung capacity (measured as Forced Expiratory Volume, or FEV, in litres) of children aged 3 to 19 (Tager et al. 1979; Kahn 2005), and also recorded whether not the children were smokers. One finding from the data (Dunn and Smyth 2018) is that children who smoke have a larger average FEV (i.e. larger average lung capacity) than children who do not smoke.Name a confounding variable that may explain this surprising finding. Would it be likely that this variable is a lurking variable?